(5 Minutes Read) “Just as Little Red Riding Hood entered the wood, a wolf met her. Red Riding Hood did not know what a wicked creature he was, and was not at all afraid of him.” From Little Red Riding Hood
(Note: This blog was written prior to the “Cuties” Netflix movie made in France widely condemned as child pornography featuring 11-year-old girls. The recent legislation in France discussed below may explain how “Cuties” came to win an award in France in 2020, instead of being condemned as child porn.)
Following the rape of two 11-year-old girls by two men, one 30 and the other 29, France’s Assembly voted against a law to create an absolute line protecting children under 15 from rape.
Because this is counter-intuitive for people with a moral compass to think about, to put it another way: the French Assembly, “champions of European liberalism”, voted against a law to set the legal age of consent at 15 . Such a law would have prevented rapists of children from hiring big-money-sly-as-wolves defence lawyers to needle 11-year-old girls on the witness stand and get off on an “it was consensual sex” dismissal.
While France voted against drawing this absolute line to protect children from rape. in most other countries the age of consent has risen steadily since the 19th century.
In 2018 Liberal France voted against a law to provide absolute protection to children when child pornography, pedophilia and child sex slavery is running rampant across the internet, making children more vulnerable than ever before.
Defenders of liberalism will quickly cry, but the French did vote to add an extra hoop for the sly-as-wolves child rapist defence attorneys to go through. The French did add to the existing law that a Judge (almost always a Liberal Judge) will decide if the child, say a 5 or 6 year-old, was morally coerced or surprised by the man sexually assaulting them.
Here is what was added into the new French law which allows Judges to decide if there was moral coercion or surprise in each case:
“Where these acts are perpetrated upon the person of a child aged under 15, moral coercion or surprise are characterized by an abuse of the vulnerability of a victim who does not have the judgement or understanding for such acts.”
The French refused to accept a child is of course and always, morally coerced and surprised by rape, having no ability to understand what is happening, and the man has no defence regardless of the skill of their defence attorney.
Defenders of this legal relativism also argue, yeah-but, there is also now a longer time for child rape victims to report the allegation; and, France also increased the punishments. However, that is only applicable should the sly-as-wolves child rapist defence attorneys fail to get through the above very wide hoop:
“Excluding cases of rape or any kind of sexual assault, the perpetration by an adult of a sexual infraction upon a child aged under 15 is punishable by seven years in prison and a fine of €150,000 ($173,300).”
Liberalism can defend this all they want, with its “relativism”, “context matters” talk, but the clear fact is that the French had an opportunity, but refused to stand for the absolute truth that child rape by someone who knows the child is underage is indefensible.
Refusing to pass this absolute line on child rape leaves the judgement of child rapists to the discretion of largely Liberal judges many of whom will have the mindset of the dark era in the 1960’s and 1970s for children, well researched and bravely put forward by The Atlantic. It was a time in which there was an active and open push for pedophilia by some Liberal academics and so-called “intellectuals”.
This is the historical context in which France not only refused to set the age limit at 15, but it remains one of very few countries to have no age of consent at all. Many or most Islamic countries have no age of consent either. Online Islamism teaches a similar, relativity, contextual argument for consent: it depends on Islamic opinion as to whether the child, who could be as young as 6 or 11, the age of the girl which Mahoumed married, is mature enough for sex.
While taking this extremely “Liberal” position leaving young girls at the mercy of the courts after being raped, France did however, lay down the law to protect adult women from even being wolf whistled in public after a viral video showed a “wolf whistling” man punch an unappreciative woman outside of a French cafe. Perhaps if child rape was on security cameras outside of a French cafe the bank accounts of Liberal French tourism would be equally appalled to enact appropriate laws. Harsh, I know, but these are not times for pleasantries.
Update: The man who wolf whistled and punched the grown woman was sentenced to (6) months in jail. However, a 20 year old man charged with the aggravated rape of a 10 year-old girl in Finland was found not guilty because there was not evidence to show the 10 year-year old girl raped by a Muslim man was overcome by fear or otherwise incapacitated.