(2 Minute Read) Did Mr. Krebs indirectly admit the forensic audit election fraud finding that an astounding 68% error rate on absentee ballots was intentional? (Time Stamp 1:52-1:55) Two technical issues were, intentionally or not, incorrectly conflated today leading to a false declaration by a Democrat Senator that the 68% issue had now been debunked. The issue may have been missed by the Senators who are not as technologically savvy. These are the two issues that were conflated:

Point 1: the forensic audit (among many other findings), found that:

The [Dominion Voting System] intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors [not seen in previous election]. Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%.

These are not human errors; this is definitively related to the software and software configurations resulting in error rates far beyond the thresholds listed in the guidelines.

The [68.05% of] electronic ballots [with errors] are then transferred for adjudication [to poll workers]…The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.

Once in adjudication, this is a social media video of a person advising they are an Elections Supervisor showing just how easy it is for the elections workers to change votes.

Point 2: there was an attempt to tamper with audit logs and apparently successfully remove an audit trail related to point 1.

At the Senate Hearing today a Democrat Senator asked Mr. Krebs about the 68% error rate at point 1. Mr. Krebs began by referencing point 1, and without denying that 68% of the absentee ballots went suspiciously to human or machine adjudication, veered off to discuss point 2. Point 2 apparently was in his view an arguable finding, and in technical language he argued with great specificity against point 2.

If Mr. Krebs had simply come out and said “68% of absentee ballots were not flagged causing them to go to human or machine adjudication and here is how I know that”, that would have debunked the 68% issue. However, he did not say that, but instead veered off to discus point 2. Maybe this was an oversight on his part.

The result was that the Democrat Senator erroneously thanked Mr. Krebs for clearing up the disinformation and spinning by President Trump. This left the clear implication that point 1 had been debunked when in fact it had not. To the contrary, not only did Mr. Krebs not deny point 1, but the Dominion Voting System CEO did not deny the 68% issue at point 1 either at the Michigan hearing yesterday. However, it should be pointed out that DVS was not asked about this key finding by the State Senators. It makes one wonder if the CEO’s legal team said a question on the 68% issue was off the table.

The vast majority of election workers are honest and hardworking and the innocent pawns of fraudsters who designed to rig the election. They must already be traumatized by the scrutiny, and they must be protected from anyone attacking them individually without specific, proven evidence. It doesn’t mean that those who broke the law and committed election fraud can hide behind them. There needs to be forensic audits and investigations to clear the names of these innocent people.