Misrepresentation 1: The Student’s claims of institutional wrongdoing were groundless.

The Documented Fact: The UBC Senate Appeals Committee found that the Department of English mounted an unseemly attack on the student in response to her “Holy Day Observance without Penalty” appeal that “descended well beneath the current standards of Charter values.”

Misrepresentation 2: The litigation was about a B- grade.

The Documented Fact: The official records show the case was a matter of principle regarding student religious accommodation. The instructor assessed the known Christian student’s work as an “agenda of resistance” in marking her overall grade.

Misrepresentation 3: The Plaintiff sought $18m for personal enrichment.

The Documented Fact: The pre-trial signed 2007 Amended Statement of Claim removed all specified dollar amounts. The court transcripts verify that the student plaintiff asked the court, pee the Civil Rights Protection Act, to direct any award to a Student Religious Freedom Fund.